Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 | |
| Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Artifacts | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Omniscience | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Artifacts , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control , Azorius Convoke , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph
Meta Performance Analysis
Meticulous Archive ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 65.4%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Meticulous Archive is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 43.21 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 73.2%. Meticulous Archive has a win rate of 76.8%, making it 5.0% better than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice of Victory | Creature — Human Bard | 9 | 85.7% | 5 |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 30 | 82.2% | 20 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 46 | 80.0% | 25 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 34 | 79.2% | 19 |
| Bushwhack | Sorcery | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
| Cache Grab | Instant | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
| Eddymurk Crab | Creature — Elemental Crab | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
| Seed of Hope | Instant | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
| Tolarian Terror | Creature — Serpent | 9 | 78.8% | 5 |
| Keen-Eyed Curator | Creature — Raccoon Scout | 8 | 76.2% | 4 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Meticulous Archive than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 5 | 90.5% | 76.8% | +13.7% |
| Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 3 | 7 | 82.4% | 72.6% | +9.8% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 12 | 84.4% | 77.6% | +6.8% |
| Roiling Dragonstorm | Enchantment | 2 | 14 | 82.1% | 76.5% | +5.6% |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 2 | 30 | 85.4% | 80.1% | +5.2% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 30 | 80.3% | 75.3% | +5.0% |
| Season of Weaving | Sorcery | 6 | 5 | 86.7% | 81.7% | +4.9% |
| Sunfall | Sorcery | 5 | 19 | 81.0% | 76.4% | +4.6% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 47 | 78.4% | 74.0% | +4.4% |
| Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 4 | 36 | 80.1% | 75.8% | +4.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 788 | 60.3% | 47.7% |
| Azorius Tempo | 394 | 99.0% | 41.9% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 337 | 99.7% | 50.4% |
| Azorius Control | 306 | 82.7% | 48.6% |
| Mono White Tokens | 100 | 16.5% | 41.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.